Why are you calling for the @Administrator (thatās how you tag them btw) to kick me out? Iāve broken no rule that Iām aware of, and Iām pretty sure Iām allowed to have a different opinion than you.
Iām not going to apologize for disrupting an absolute echo chamber. Nice gatekeeping, though; I bet my Slate reservation is ahead of yours, but please go ahead and pretend Iām in the wrong place.
So youāve decided to abandon rational thought in favor of what you assume about what Slate researched. I still think, however, that the overwhelming majority of Slate owners will stick an iPad on the dash.
Youāre comparing the 2025 price of a Model 3 to your imagined price of a 2027 Slate.
And youāre mistaken because, as Iāve pointed out several times now, no one is buying a new Slate for the advertised price anytime soon after itās released.
The three of you are all free to continue deluding...
What I was referring to is that most automakers start high on price and *promise* to work their way down to the advertised price, eventually. It never happens but people apparently still believe them because thatās what they want to hear and believe.
Ok, let us all know when you pick up your $17k Slate.
I guess either youāre wrong or Iām wrong, but Iām sticking with more iPads in Slates than phones because I know humans and human eyeballs that donāt like squinting at 65 MPH.
Thatās great. So, the rest of the market pretty much looks at price and aesthetic appeal, then makes a purchase decision. Theyāre not considering weight unless itās a detriment, which in this comparison is not the case. Again, you seem to think people want less range and I canāt go there with...
Not sure I need to own a Tesla to understand its market. Following that logic, you donāt own a Slate, so what do you know about its market?
Model 3 is under $35k today. Next year, itāll be under $30k and cheaper than most Slates.
If you think Slates will be $20k anytime soon, youāre not...
You must think Tesla is a luxury brand still. Itās actually one of the most affordable auto brands out right now, electric or not, which is why they are totally ubiquitous. Slate and Tesla are both vying for urban dwellers, particularly at the lower end of the auto market.
Just like in 2019 after Tesla lost the credit, the Model 3 magically dropped in price about $5k. And the Chevy Bolt dropped $5k in 2020 for the same reason. But all the people who support these atrocious tax rebates tell me theyāre necessary to support the EV market. No, itās just another...
More convenient because I never have to go to a dealer for a $100 oil change or $1k for spark plugs, etc. Also more convenient in that I donāt have to stop at a gas station, I just pull into my garage and plug it in while I eat dinner and sleep.
As for carbon, maybe ask your power company how...
This is demonstrably false. And nearly everyone has known itās false for at least 5 years now. Iām not interested in an EV to delude myself about the environment; I just think theyāre convenient.
Same here. Two door Bronco hauls everything I need. Most pickups these days are luxury vehicles that no one will ever use to haul anything at all. My dad will drive a pickup every single day of the year because he gets mulch twice a year, itās hilarious.
I keep seeing images of the Slate hauling around plywood and drywall, and people saying things like the above but Iām over here wondering to myself who are all these carpenters and contractors without a truck, or how often are other people building additions onto your home?
We donāt know the size of Bezosās stake but investors donāt run companies anyway, so it doesnāt really matter what he thinks about the future of EV rebates.
And if Slate canāt be competitive without the rebate, they should rightfully fail. I hope they can be a profitable company on their own...