Tesla and Rivian do. Slate is a little different with the lack of storefronts, or whatever they call their physical buildings, but it is not out of the realm of possibility.
Those trucks have to go somewhere once they drop off their Slates...
Ha! I was actually agreeing with Mr. Railroad, however my language may not have been clear. Amazon does not have direct spurs, but instead runs railyard -> FC.
For a variety of reasons, Amazon is not a good partner for delivery. They don't have a significant advantage on cost due to that...
Out of thin air- it's not true.
The FC network is certainly built in close proximity to rail lines, but no FCs that I know of have a direct spur. Their network for rail generally goes railyard -> IXD -> FC.
Which, in practice, would be no different than railyard -> semi to a empty parking lot...
Worth mentioning that the Slate will very likely NOT make it as easy. Yes, there are great apps like ABRP, but I would not expect as seamless of integration as Tesla.
Slate didn't announce it, but it's the way it goes.
I should have clarified my post was speculation from watching other launch vehicles. Rivian is going through it right now with the R2.
Important to remember customer deliveries does not mean the people in this forum. Slate likely will start with employee (customer) deliveries, then high profile (read: influencers), before selling to general public. If I had to guess, I'd say we will see a 2-3 month latency between the first...
Yep! And in my opinion, the Slate still uses parts that love to break in due time. Struts, control arms, generally anything that connects the frame to the rubber finds a way to break. That's not a knock on Slate or any other mfg- just where parts break. And they're a pain in the neck to replace...
For the 358th time- flatlanders don't seem to realize that there are states where not having AWD is a downright detriment. If you drive over Donner Pass with any regularity- stopping and throwing chains on to get through the checkpoint is an extra ~15 minutes in wet, cold, subpar conditions...
Let’s unpack this logic…. You know someone who had their nav break, which means it is better to not have a nav unit than potentially have one break?
Isn’t he just at the same starting spot as the Slate? This is just flawed logic from the top down.
In summary- Slate is going to use industry standard parts but somehow produce a vehicle above industry standard? And they will make a software better than every OEM, because every other OEM, big or small, just.... forgot? To make a good one?
@phidauex summed it up best. This is entirely blind...
This is good and dandy, but what is saying the Slate will be any more reliable? I'm sure Ford didn't say they were engineering the Maverick to blow up when they released it... as of now it is all lipservice. Slate might build an ultra-reliable runner that goes 300k miles with just tires...
I think Slate is successful if they are still selling vehicles in X years. My gut tells me X is 5 years, but I think the answer is closer to 10.
I do not like Hyundai products, and would not buy one as a first choice, or second, or third, but they are still a successful company.
Trolling? Really?
I’m a day 1 reservation holder, I’ve been on this forum as long. My intent here is to discuss and engage in conversations around the Truck, because I’m interested in it.
Let’s walk through this thread, @AZFox . You started with some lofty claims, saying Slate would have a...