CorvusCorvax
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2026
- Threads
- 2
- Messages
- 43
- Reaction score
- 73
- Location
- Portland, OR
- Vehicles
- 1985 Porsche 911, 2009 BMW 328i Touring, 1997 Ford F-150, 2010 Audi A6 Avant
Your intellectual insecurity is not my problem. Since I have never publically claimed anywhere that I am "smarter" than anyone else, that's all on you.You can drop the condescending attitude; you not smarter than anyone else nor more enlightened. But to reiterate, I never said my (politically-based) argument was about forcing EV on Americans. I said an argument can be made that the EV decision (was made for us.
I'll let others draw their own conclusions.
No, no rational argument can be made that EVs were forced on us, chosen for us, nor any of the other verbs you might want to use. Considering the very active propaganda campaign against EVs, it is not surprising that some people would repeat the disinformation like you have here. Once you examine the economics of it, it's easy to see how EVs came to be the alternative to ICEVs.
Nobody forced me to put my $50 in, nobody whispered into my ear that I needed to change my commuter vehicle's energy source, nobody twisted my arm to choose Slate after a lifetime of ICEVs. Slate is offering a compelling product at a reasonable price that fulfills at least two automotive needs. That smells a whole lot like capitalism and freedom.
