Sponsored

BFLO-SL8

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2026
Threads
1
Messages
6
Reaction score
34
Location
NY
Vehicles
2008 Frontier 2025 Envista
I drove the Slate truck. Its toy-like looks hide a surprisingly serious pickup.

July 30, 2026

Cheap cars typically suck.

Consider the Mitsubishi Mirage. During its final decade in the US, the roughly $17,000 hatchback achieved its low price through obvious trade-offs: an engine that whined at highway speeds, a punishing suspension, and an interior so cramped that occupants rubbed shoulders.

Its 2024 discontinuation helped usher in the first period in modern US automotive history without a new car priced below $20,000.

So, when Slate announced a $24,950 starting price for a 2027 model, I assumed the low cost would come with plenty of compromises.

“Building an affordable EV is difficult enough. Building one profitably — without making it miserable to drive — seemed even harder.

Then, on Tuesday, I became one of only a handful of people in the world who have driven a Slate prototype. I sat behind the wheel of the base truck for about 45 minutes and guided it through the windy, oceanfront roads of Newport, Rhode Island.

My skepticism didn't survive the experience.”


Impressions behind the wheel

“I've driven plenty of different kinds of trucks in my career — everything from the Chevrolet Silverado EV Trail Boss to the Honda Ridgeline to the Ford Ranger Raptor.

The Slate is smaller and far less powerful than any of them. It still feels plenty truck-ish from behind the wheel.”

“Its big-nosed hood — which covers a seven-cubic-foot frunk, enough to fit roughly two medium-sized check-in bags — gives the driver the commanding view Americans expect from a pickup. It took me a moment to judge where the bumper ended, but it also made the Slate feel more substantial than its toy-like exterior suggests.

The two-person cabin gives both occupants more than enough room. At an aggressively average 5 feet 9 inches tall, I had what felt like a mile of space above my head. Slate says one of its 6-foot-8 engineers fits comfortably, though he wasn't around for me to verify that claim.

The truck also drives better than its specifications suggest. Slate says it takes more than eight seconds to reach 60 mph, but the electric motor's immediate punch keeps it from feeling slow. With the battery mounted beneath the floor, it also felt balanced and impressively composed when accelerating through high-degree corners.

Its aggressive, Tesla-like regenerative braking initially made my inputs jerky. Once I learned to feather the accelerator, however, the one-pedal driving felt natural, and I rarely touched the brake.

“That is, until we stopped on an incline. The prototype rolled backward before its hill-hold system caught it, an awkward behavior Slate says it is still refining.

I also heard a few rattles over larger bumps, and the range display wasn't fully functional. Slate attributed both issues to the truck's prototype status.

Should those rough edges disappear before deliveries begin later this year, the Slate will be an impressive truck for the money. Its handling, space, and genuine truck-like feel frequently made me forget that affordability is its main pitch.”


Who is the Slate for? We will see soon.

Slate is making a series of wagers that the rest of the auto industry has largely abandoned.

It bet Americans want a smaller truck, can live with two doors, and that drivers are tired of touchscreens, subscriptions, and paying for self-driving options.

“Most importantly, it is betting that enough people want a new vehicle starting at $24,950 — roughly half the average price Americans now pay at a new-car dealership.

That makes the Slate easy to explain but strangely difficult to place.

Detroit has spent years prioritizing enormous four-door pickups. Two-door trucks have largely disappeared from the US market, and even Slate buyers who add the company's SUV conversion and rear seats will have to climb through the front doors to reach them.”

“Its business model is equally unconventional. Slate hopes customers will keep spending after buying the truck, but not through the monthly software subscriptions that Detroit has recently fallen in love with.

Instead, owners can add speakers, new upholstery, storage accessories, body wraps, and the parts needed to turn the pickup into an SUV. The pitch is less "pay to unlock this software feature" and more "physically build the vehicle you want."

Slate is applying the same less-is-more philosophy to its cabin presentation. A company representative told me modern, screen-heavy cars have become too distracting, even at the cheaper end of the market.

Perhaps some buyers really are ready for a car that does less in our increasingly AI-ified world — and costs less because of it.

My drive largely resolves one of my biggest questions about the truck's composure. The Slate is fun, roomy, and far more convincing behind the wheel than its appearance suggests. I could imagine it appealing to fleet operators, small businesses, and buyers who want an inexpensive vehicle they will not feel precious about.

The harder question is whether those groups add up to a mass market.

Slate says its factory will eventually be capable of producing 150,000 trucks a year. Reaching anything close to that number would require the startup to survive an EV market that has already buried Fisker, Lordstown Motors, and Nikola, strained Lucid and Rivian, and cost Detroit automakers billions. Only one automaker — Tesla — has successfully traversed America's so-called "EV valley of death" to consistent, visible profitability.


Slate believes the industry left several openings that it can follow Tesla's lead in.

Whether those were genuine gaps — or warnings that other automakers already noticed — will determine what happens next.

https://www.businessinsider.com/slate-truck-test-drive-electric-pickup-ev-2026-7
 

sidneyhornblower

Well-Known Member
First Name
Drew
Joined
Dec 17, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
54
Reaction score
218
Location
Southeast USA
Vehicles
Hyundai Accent and Kia Soul
That's a good article from someone who actually drove the truck. I noted that he calls the regen braking "aggressive" but that he got used to it. He also called the cab fun and roomy.
 

E90400K

Well-Known Member
First Name
Francis
Joined
Apr 26, 2025
Threads
8
Messages
2,031
Reaction score
2,464
Location
Under a Bridge in the Middle of the Mid Atlantic
Vehicles
A Ford truck
Interesting that the drive was 45 minutes and not part of the 6/24 price party that was held in Los Angeles. We got a drive review on New England east coast roads by a non-internet "EVs-rule" influencer. Fresh perspective.
 

EV Trek

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tim
Joined
Aug 5, 2025
Threads
11
Messages
961
Reaction score
1,817
Location
Johnson City Tennessee
Vehicles
2024 Equinox EV, 2001 Chevy Monte Carlo
That's a good article from someone who actually drove the truck. I noted that he calls the regen braking "aggressive" but that he got used to it. He also called the cab fun and roomy.
Possible since he noted it was still a prototype some of the Regen Tuning may not be the latest or final version.
 

kvermeer

Well-Known Member
First Name
Kevin
Joined
Mar 29, 2026
Threads
10
Messages
517
Reaction score
1,249
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
Vehicles
Toyota Sequoia, Toyota Highlander, Ford Escape, (previously) Ford Ranger
Nice article!

> Its aggressive, Tesla-like regenerative braking initially made my inputs jerky. Once I learned to feather the accelerator, however, the one-pedal driving felt natural, and I rarely touched the brake.

I find the other threads on this forum that describe mandatory 1PD as a deal breaker, that the old dogs could never learn new 1PD tricks to be embarrassing. If he only drove it for 45 minutes, that can barely count as a learning curve! No, when you were 16, your first starts off the line were probably a little jerky. You learned and adjusted. You can learn again.

Looking back through his review history, I don't see that he's ever driven a Tesla. He's got articles on the Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV9, Polestar 2, Fiat 500e, and Rivian R1T, all of which have significantly adjustable (or even optional) 1PD modes.

> Its big-nosed hood — which covers a seven-cubic-foot frunk, enough to fit roughly two medium-sized check-in bags — gives the driver the commanding view Americans expect from a pickup.

It's a good thing that the author lists a Ridgeline among the trucks he's driven. I've got a Ford Superduty F250, a Silverado 2500HD, a Ram 4500, and a couple F350/F450 flatbeds in my more recent past that threaten to crowd out familiarity with the '93 Ranger in my profile photo. I cannot imagine the view from the Slate truck being described as the "commanding view Americans expect." If it really is a hideously gargantuan vehicle as I might expect from those other modern American trucks... ick, I'm going to want the lowering kit more than I already do.

> Slate hopes customers will keep spending after buying the truck, but not through the monthly software subscriptions that Detroit has recently fallen in love with. ... The pitch is less "pay to unlock this software feature" and more "physically build the vehicle you want."

Thank you, Slate! I'm aggressively, vehemently, combatatively not in love with those pay-to-play features. Many years ago, I read an article by Joel Spoelsky (a writer/tech entrepeneur, founder of StackOverflow) in which he wrote:

> Working my way backwards, this business about segmenting? It pisses the heck off of people. People want to feel they’re paying a fair price. ... customers had no loyalty whatsover to the legacy airlines that had been trying to pick their pockets for all those years.

> And God help you if an A-list blogger finds out that your premium printer is identical to the cheap printer, with the speed inhibitor turned off.

We frogs have been thoroughly boiled, today no one would be surprised to have to pay a monthly subscription and keep the printer connected to the Internet where it can sell your print history if you want to keep the speed inhibitor turned off.

I'm buying Slate in large part because it rejects those hostile trends!
 

E90400K

Well-Known Member
First Name
Francis
Joined
Apr 26, 2025
Threads
8
Messages
2,031
Reaction score
2,464
Location
Under a Bridge in the Middle of the Mid Atlantic
Vehicles
A Ford truck
Great article! As someone who's newest car is from 2013, I basically avoided the whole pay to play thing and lived to survive it.

Can you believe it's almost August?
My most recent is a 2022, I have no subscriptions that actually operate any of the functions of the vehicle. Sure, it has Sirius XM that can be a subscription, but it is not necessary, and Sirius XM has been around as subscription service for nearly 20 years IIRC.

IMO, "right-to-repair" and subscription services are way overblown on this forum and on internet car forums in general.
 

E90400K

Well-Known Member
First Name
Francis
Joined
Apr 26, 2025
Threads
8
Messages
2,031
Reaction score
2,464
Location
Under a Bridge in the Middle of the Mid Atlantic
Vehicles
A Ford truck
"I could imagine it appealing to... buyers who want an inexpensive vehicle they will not feel precious about."

Ding, Ding, Ding! We have a winner!

Yet, this vehicle is the most "personalizable" vehicle ever in the history of the automotive industry, even more than Porsche. [I present today's Slate email as evidence]
 

FlyHappy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mitchell
Joined
Jun 22, 2026
Threads
4
Messages
360
Reaction score
766
Location
USA
Vehicles
A fleet of dogs
> Its big-nosed hood — which covers a seven-cubic-foot frunk, enough to fit roughly two medium-sized check-in bags — gives the driver the commanding view Americans expect from a pickup.

It's a good thing that the author lists a Ridgeline among the trucks he's driven. I've got a Ford Superduty F250, a Silverado 2500HD, a Ram 4500, and a couple F350/F450 flatbeds in my more recent past that threaten to crowd out familiarity with the '93 Ranger in my profile photo. I cannot imagine the view from the Slate truck being described as the "commanding view Americans expect." If it really is a hideously gargantuan vehicle as I might expect from those other modern American trucks... ick, I'm going to want the lowering kit more than I already do.
this commanding view comment caught my eye as well.
I sort of interpret that the reviewer was mashing two different things together - on one hand, the common low and sleek front ends common in EV's like an M3, Hyundai/Kia vs the long and high front ends typical in an American truck/SUV.

I think it was his way of saying that its front end was proportioned in a way that left no mistake that you were driving a truck (even if compact), with a very classic long and horizontal hood.
 

ChuckB

Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2026
Threads
0
Messages
8
Reaction score
15
Location
PA
Vehicles
Rio
Nice article!

> Its aggressive, Tesla-like regenerative braking initially made my inputs jerky. Once I learned to feather the accelerator, however, the one-pedal driving felt natural, and I rarely touched the brake.

I find the other threads on this forum that describe mandatory 1PD as a deal breaker, that the old dogs could never learn new 1PD tricks to be embarrassing. If he only drove it for 45 minutes, that can barely count as a learning curve! No, when you were 16, your first starts off the line were probably a little jerky. You learned and adjusted. You can learn again.

Looking back through his review history, I don't see that he's ever driven a Tesla. He's got articles on the Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV9, Polestar 2, Fiat 500e, and Rivian R1T, all of which have significantly adjustable (or even optional) 1PD modes.

> Its big-nosed hood — which covers a seven-cubic-foot frunk, enough to fit roughly two medium-sized check-in bags — gives the driver the commanding view Americans expect from a pickup.

It's a good thing that the author lists a Ridgeline among the trucks he's driven. I've got a Ford Superduty F250, a Silverado 2500HD, a Ram 4500, and a couple F350/F450 flatbeds in my more recent past that threaten to crowd out familiarity with the '93 Ranger in my profile photo. I cannot imagine the view from the Slate truck being described as the "commanding view Americans expect." If it really is a hideously gargantuan vehicle as I might expect from those other modern American trucks... ick, I'm going to want the lowering kit more than I already do.

> Slate hopes customers will keep spending after buying the truck, but not through the monthly software subscriptions that Detroit has recently fallen in love with. ... The pitch is less "pay to unlock this software feature" and more "physically build the vehicle you want."

Thank you, Slate! I'm aggressively, vehemently, combatatively not in love with those pay-to-play features. Many years ago, I read an article by Joel Spoelsky (a writer/tech entrepeneur, founder of StackOverflow) in which he wrote:

> Working my way backwards, this business about segmenting? It pisses the heck off of people. People want to feel they’re paying a fair price. ... customers had no loyalty whatsover to the legacy airlines that had been trying to pick their pockets for all those years.

> And God help you if an A-list blogger finds out that your premium printer is identical to the cheap printer, with the speed inhibitor turned off.

We frogs have been thoroughly boiled, today no one would be surprised to have to pay a monthly subscription and keep the printer connected to the Internet where it can sell your print history if you want to keep the speed inhibitor turned off.

I'm buying Slate in large part because it rejects those hostile trends!
Can’t wait for my Slate!
 
 





Top