AZFox
Well-Known Member
Seems reasonable enough.IIRC, the safety advantage is either limited or mostly-limited to "aqueous" sodium-ion batteries, which also have the more significant disadvantage on energy density. So, the non-aqueous ones being used for automotive traction batteries are probably similar to lithium-ion/NMC in terms of safety.
The AI Slop I saw when I submitted a query was this:
Sodium-ion batteries have a significantly lower fire risk compared to lithium-ion batteries, as they do not emit smoke, ignite, or explode when punctured and have better thermal stability. In contrast, lithium-ion batteries are more prone to thermal runaway and can catch fire under certain conditions, especially if damaged or improperly handled.
Attribute | Sodium Batteries | Lithium Batteries |
|---|---|---|
Fire Risk | Lower risk of fire | Higher risk of fire |
Thermal Stability | Higher self-heating temperature (260°C) | Lower self-heating temperature (165°C) |
Reaction to Damage | Do not ignite or explode when punctured | Can catch fire or explode under stress |
Safety Tests | Passes tests for short circuits, overcharging, and compression without catching fire | Prone to thermal runaway and can explode if damaged |
Reasons for Differences
Chemical Properties: Sodium is more stable than lithium, leading to a lower likelihood of dangerous reactions.
Electrolyte Composition: Sodium batteries often use non-flammable solvents, while lithium batteries typically contain volatile liquid electrolytes.
Dendrite Formation: Lithium batteries can develop needle-like structures (dendrites) that can cause short circuits and fires, a risk not present in sodium batteries.