5ohbrad
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Brad
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2025
- Threads
- 6
- Messages
- 68
- Reaction score
- 106
- Location
- Mansfield, Texas
- Vehicles
- Nissan Frontier
- Thread starter
- #16
My wishful thinking is that they were seeking 150 miles of range with the 32” tires which would obviously indicate a much higher range on standard tires. We will have to wait and see.You asked a good question. Unfortunately there's no way the answer will turn out to be true.
Presumably the Slate Truck, being an EV, was range-tested while equipped with stock-sized "EV tires" that have been engineered for low rolling resistance.
Tire rolling resistance affects range severely. According to the EPA (so it must be true!) rolling resistance can account for up to 23% of lost energy efficiency in EVs. Tire manufacturers claim that "EV" tires can reduce rolling resistance by 10-20%.
All-Terrain tires are inherently heavier. The extra weight is "rotating mass". Extra rotating mass also lowers range. For reference, one pound of rotating weight is considered equivalent to about three to ten pounds of static weight.
Increasing tire diameter also has a gearing effect that negatively affects range, performance, ride quality, and parts wear-and-tear. More about that is in this post.