bartflossom
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Hal
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2025
- Threads
- 29
- Messages
- 334
- Reaction score
- 588
- Location
- Frisco, TX
- Vehicles
- Silver Maverick XLT Hybrid - "Dirk"
I hope so.My guess is that chemistry will be LFP.
I hope so.My guess is that chemistry will be LFP.
It would reduce range for a given weight of battery, because it's less power dense. But the small battery was going to have empty space anyway, so you could have the small battery be LFP and the big battery NMC.But wouldn't LFP battery chemistry reduce range? I don't see that as a benefit.
I see the benefits as being able to charge to 100% every night, plus reduced fire risk. Reduced range is the trade-off.But wouldn't LFP battery chemistry reduce range? I don't see that as a benefit.
They could either reduce range or keep similar range and increase weight (reduce load capacity).It would reduce range for a given weight of battery, because it's less power dense.
I’m with you there!Leaning toward standard battery, but would be great if it could get closer to 175-200 miles
I think between the two, reducing range would be more likely than adding weight and reducing load capacity.But I recall some talk about the standard or base battery potentially being adjusted in some way to achieve the mid $25k price goal. My thoughts were that indicated a reduction in range. 🤷🏼♂️
Too late. 😉Slate really needs to release more information, or we're all going to lose our minds in here.