MIDgrid
Member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2025
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 22
- Location
- Olympic Penninsula, WA
- Vehicles
- Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk, Sprinter 3500 motorhome
- Thread starter
- #1
Given a choice, I would prefer LFP for additional safety and lifetime (charger cycles) over the NCM chemistry that Slate has announced. And maybe SK On will be able to minimize the energy density reduction/vehicle range reduction penalty:Changing to another battery chemistry doesn't necessarily mean Slate needs to change suppliers.
electrive: SK On to manufacture LFP battery cells
“We are developing high-performance LFP batteries with high energy density and fast charging speed, based on our technological capabilities that have led the market for high energy density NCM batteries,” Yoon Hyung-jo, SK On’s head of planning, told an investor conference.
Slate has already indicated it is taking another look at battery suppliers since the slowdown in EV sales has made additional EV battery production capacity available. And SK On is planning to start production of LFP battery cells at their Georgia plant in the second half of 2026.