Net gain (or loss) per truck produced - Slate's answer

What do you think


  • Total voters
    18
OP
OP
1yeliab_sufur1

1yeliab_sufur1

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2025
Threads
19
Messages
195
Reaction score
98
Location
phoenix
Vehicles
king ranch F-150
Way too early to speculate but I wonder if Slate will handle their own financing for customers. Interest payments would help soften it a little on purchases.
they did say they would have financing or people could get out side financing
 

Roy

Member
First Name
Roy
Joined
Apr 30, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
10
Reaction score
8
Location
Kalispell, MT
Vehicles
90 Miata, 2005 Forester, 2007 Forester, 2008 Ford Ranger
Regarding the money flow on this start-up. As the answer said, this is a private held company. So where all of the start-up money has originated from, or what tax breaks they may have acquired is not going to be know for sometime. I would suspect that a bean counter has already forecast all of this with a possible 10 or 15 % variable. But you have to admit that the wild cards in all of this will be the economy. What affect tariffs and inflation have on that forecast. If they follow a semi-normal business pattern, I would suspect that 5 years is there pain point. At three years they should have a good picture of that future bench mark.

I am betting my, refundable 50 bucks, that they will get a simple, affordable EV to market on time and on the price point.
 

danielt1263

Active Member
Joined
May 25, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
25
Reaction score
17
Location
Tampa, Florida
Vehicles
Kia Forte Koup
I suspect they will sell the truck for more than their marginal cost, otherwise they can't expect to recoup their expenses, but I think they will be going for volume of sales rather than high profit margin.

Someone up thread guessed 30% profit margin and that may very well be what the big auto manufacturers pull, but I think Slate will be going for something much lower for the vehicle itself... 10% at best. At least at first. Now for the add-ons? That's likely going to be quite a bit bigger profit margin and 30% sounds reasonable for those parts. Maybe even 50% for the smaller light covers and such.
 
OP
OP
1yeliab_sufur1

1yeliab_sufur1

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2025
Threads
19
Messages
195
Reaction score
98
Location
phoenix
Vehicles
king ranch F-150
Well we don’t know the manufacturer cost of the truck by it self ether for all we know it cost 11,000 and all the rest is mark up
 

OldGoat

Member
First Name
Chuck
Joined
May 23, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
16
Reaction score
19
Location
Michigan
Vehicles
Mustang Mach E, Honda Odyssey
If a manufacturer pulls a 20% margin on a volume vehicle they are quite happy. That’s why they load them up with “options “ as 20% of $50k is more profitable than 20% of $40k. Slate will likely pull 40-60% margins on aftermarket goods.
 

GraySlate

New Member
First Name
Jon
Joined
May 27, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Location
Maryland
Vehicles
2024 Bronco Wildtrak, 2024 F250 Lariat Ultimate Tremor Crew Cab
lol ok makes since is 30% the norm ?
30% isn't the norm anymore. Tesla, for instance, is running at about 16% (approx. $7000 per vehicle using $45k average sales price) right now, and they are at the top of the profitability food chain for mass built vehicles at this time. Mercedes is at about 12% (approx. $5300/vehicle using a $44k average sales price). Average sales price is probably on the low side for both, but my per vehicle dollars are documented, so their percentages are probably a little lower than i'm saying.
Tesla was much higher in 21 and 22 (about $10k-$13k per vehicle), but that has changed with competition forcing lower vehicle pricing, etc. I would guess that Slate is doing their due diligence to develop ways to maximize profitability of their aftermarket add-ons to make up for their low price and margin on the vehicles (among other things too).
 
 
Top