Sponsored

Ford's Massive Product Renewal

beatle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2026
Threads
2
Messages
300
Reaction score
583
Location
Springfield, VA
Vehicles
'23 R1T, '97/25 Miatas
I wonder if the Fathom, Mach-E, and Bronco EV (name?) will share the same platform. They do say it's "universal."
 
OP
OP
AZFox

AZFox

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2025
Threads
64
Messages
2,869
Reaction score
5,696
Location
Arizona
Vehicles
Honda NC700X
I wonder if the Fathom, Mach-E, and Bronco EV (name?) will share the same platform. They do say it's "universal."
No, it's a complete clean-sheet re-design by a separate skunkworks team and will be kept separate from Ford's other operations.

Slate Auto Pickup Truck Ford's Massive Product Renewal Ford_Universal_EV_Platform_1x1


See also:
The Mustang Mach-E Won't Move To Ford's New EV Platform
  • Ford’s EV reset may be less about updating old models and more about moving past them.
 

Hootowls

Member
First Name
Al
Joined
Jan 18, 2026
Threads
1
Messages
12
Reaction score
7
Location
Georgia
Vehicles
Honda
I read an article from a good while ago, that said Ford’s problem is they completely redesign most models each year. While Toyota and Honda just tweak an existing model for the next year. This gives them a chance to improve a model, while only screwing one or two things, not the the whole car. I know the CRV was basicly the same from 2017 to 2019 (I had both). I never understood Ford‘s reasoning. If you have something that works, don’t change it, except for chrome or appearance. Just make small adjustments to make it better.

I am hoping that Slate’s simplicity will have less to go wrong!?
HootOwls
 

Johnologue

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Dec 14, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
405
Reaction score
940
Location
WA, USA
Vehicles
2017 Hyundai Veloster
I never understood Ford‘s reasoning. If you have something that works, don’t change it, except for chrome or appearance. Just make small adjustments to make it better.

I am hoping that Slate’s simplicity will have less to go wrong!?
It sounds like the problem is that they didn't have something that worked. 😆

And yeah, Slate eliminated a lot of common points of failure in the infotainment alone. Something could always go wrong, but they should be relatively safe. I'd emphasize their use of manufacturing experts and extensive testing, but I assume/hope that those things apply to every new model of car by a legacy automaker.
 

E90400K

Well-Known Member
First Name
Francis
Joined
Apr 26, 2025
Threads
9
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
2,904
Location
Under a Bridge in the Middle of the Mid Atlantic
Vehicles
A Ford truck
I read an article from a good while ago, that said Ford’s problem is they completely redesign most models each year. While Toyota and Honda just tweak an existing model for the next year. This gives them a chance to improve a model, while only screwing one or two things, not the the whole car. I know the CRV was basicly the same from 2017 to 2019 (I had both). I never understood Ford‘s reasoning. If you have something that works, don’t change it, except for chrome or appearance. Just make small adjustments to make it better.

I am hoping that Slate’s simplicity will have less to go wrong!?
HootOwls
No auto maker does that.
 
 





Top