This is the small truck Tesla should have produced...

Slashsnake

Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Jun 9, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
18
Reaction score
11
Location
Minnesota
Vehicles
Model 3. Maverick
Slate hasn't said anything about "27-28K". They have only said:

There has been a general rush to the conclusion that this must mean "$19,995 after the $7,500 tax credit", which implies a retail price of $27,495. Maybe that assumption is correct, or maybe not. But it's only an assumption.
What's not an assumption: the CEO of Slate is on record (at 0:20 here) that a Slate costs "in the mid-20s" before the tax credit. Maybe Slate will meet that target, or maybe not. But "mid-20s" is the stated target at this time.
Of course that's the consensus. That's what major automotive press have noted after their conversations with the Slate team as well and slate has done nothing to disuade anyone from repeatedly using those numbers.

MAYBE their PR team is idiots and instead of saying "under $18k" and drumming up more support, they rounded up when that only hurts their business.

I guess if that's what you like to believe... sure. Go for it. But it's pretty outside the realm of what reality ends up being.
 

slateya

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2025
Threads
9
Messages
119
Reaction score
217
Location
Minnesota
Vehicles
Audi a4 200k miles, GMC 2500HD 350k miles, Moto Guzzi California
What I meant by the current price is the listed price at dealerships in the United States selling them today. Not the online pricing but actual prices they are listing for at dealerships today.

That is true... The price estimate for the slate is not real and we won't know until 2026/2027 when it goes on sale, and as we've seen with every single new EV, they have that lovely price point in their PR events years ahead, but by the time the vehicle goes on sale...

Yes, the MSRP is higher and Ford is doing Ford pricing and you can buy for much less. With the Slate, it looks like it will be pure MSRP only there. Trucks always have deals running on them. EV direct sale cars sell for their list (or 10-20% higher than their PR event initial price by the time they sell)....

That's where I struggle to see it. I see a Santa Cruz at $24,300. A single Cab Silverado at $27,500. A Maverick hybrid at $24,000. A Frontier King Cab at $28,500. A Ram Quadcab Tradesman at $29k. I like EV's... I like cheap pickups. But I can't make that price point make sense to go with something as bare bones and non-practical as the slate outside of niche situations.
Dealers are known to list bait and switch pricing. I tried looking for a 2014-17 Audi A4 a couple months ago on some of the common sites. Every one I tried to contact told me “no longer available, but we have X.” I no longer trust not just low but even reasonable advertised prices from dealers.

So here I am waiting for a no dealer non ford reasonably priced truck/suv.
 

cvollers

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chip
Joined
Apr 25, 2025
Threads
9
Messages
561
Reaction score
596
Location
Bellevue WA
Vehicles
FJ Cruiser
Of course that's the consensus. That's what major automotive press have noted after their conversations with the Slate team as well and slate has done nothing to disuade anyone from repeatedly using those numbers.

MAYBE their PR team is idiots and instead of saying "under $18k" and drumming up more support, they rounded up when that only hurts their business.

I guess if that's what you like to believe... sure. Go for it. But it's pretty outside the realm of what reality ends up being.
My last reply on this topic, I promise. Its bad PR to publicly rebut what someone in the automotive press writes or says. Slate knows this. If its close enough without being incredibly off base, let it go. At this point in time, who cares if its $24K or $25K or $27.5K? No one can write a check for a Slate right now. Wait until the pricing is announced...for the accessories too. Then you can do all the "I told you so" commentary you want. Trust me, no one will care.

And if the price ends up being too high for you by $2K, no one will care about that either.
 

YDR37

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2025
Threads
4
Messages
65
Reaction score
90
Location
California
Vehicles
Tacoma
Of course that's the consensus. That's what major automotive press have noted after their conversations with the Slate team as well and slate has done nothing to disuade anyone from repeatedly using those numbers.

MAYBE their PR team is idiots and instead of saying "under $18k" and drumming up more support, they rounded up when that only hurts their business.
It wouldn't hurt Slate's business at all if everyone is expecting pricing of $27-28k, and the final announced price is only (say) 25k. On the contrary, this would generate a ton of positive headlines.

Not saying that this will happen. Just saying it's usually good news when a company beats the analyst consensus, not a problem.
I guess if that's what you like to believe. sure. Go for it. But it's pretty outside the realm of what reality ends up being.
I don't know whether or not a blank Slate will really be "mid-20s". I'm just pointing out this is the number that the Slate CEO has offered. It may or may not be realistic, but it's the closest thing to "official" pricing that we have.
 

Slashsnake

Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Jun 9, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
18
Reaction score
11
Location
Minnesota
Vehicles
Model 3. Maverick
My last reply on this topic, I promise. Its bad PR to publicly rebut what someone in the automotive press writes or says. Slate knows this. If its close enough without being incredibly off base, let it go. At this point in time, who cares if its $24K or $25K or $27.5K? No one can write a check for a Slate right now. Wait until the pricing is announced...for the accessories too. Then you can do all the "I told you so" commentary you want. Trust me, no one will care.

And if the price ends up being too high for you by $2K, no one will care about that either.
I don't think their team is that inept. If they are that truck is doomed right?

If they have a leader using $27,499 as "mid 20k" good for him. If he meant $24,800ish and they let everyone they held time with from major journalists to walk out with an artificially high number, that is an awful group they have there and I just can't fall into the idea that this truck is off to that awful of a start with that inept of a team.
 

Slashsnake

Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Jun 9, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
18
Reaction score
11
Location
Minnesota
Vehicles
Model 3. Maverick
I don't know whether or not a basic Slate will really be "mid-20s". I'm just pointing out this is the number that the Slate CEO has offered. Maybe she knows more about future Slate pricing than you or me or the press.
I'm sure they know that if every market works out the best for them and inflation keeps to a super low level etc the lowest number they can go

And I'm really sure they have a decent group working on this that didn't send the media off quoting numbers higher than that one.

Like you say, they know. And the media walked away with those numbers to print. Slate didn't leave that to chance that the media could torpedo potential sales and news with an artificially high number. They can't be that bad.
 

YDR37

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2025
Threads
4
Messages
65
Reaction score
90
Location
California
Vehicles
Tacoma
Like you say, they know. And the media walked away with those numbers to print. Slate didn't leave that to chance that the media could torpedo potential sales and news with an artificially high number. They can't be that bad.
That's not "bad". Tesla has set the standard for "bad" electric pickup pricing expectation management with the Cybertruck. They pre-announced it in 2019 at a starting price of $39,990, then released it in 2023 at a starting price of $99,990. That's how to shock potential customers and torpedo sales. To be fair, as of 2025 Tesla offers a stripped single-motor CT for only $69,990, but this is still too high to bring back the masses of disappointed early reservation holders.

For Slate, the question is whether the pricing expectation should be "mid 20s" vs "high 20s". Given that the average transaction price for a new vehicle in the US is around $50,000, I doubt that this distinction matters greatly to most potential buyers. Clearly everyone is expecting "high 20s", but maybe Slate will pleasantly surprise us, and I don't think it will hurt them if they do.
 
Last edited:

Dorbiman

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 30, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
53
Reaction score
101
Location
WA
Vehicles
2005 Pontiac GTO
What I meant by the current price is the listed price at dealerships in the United States selling them today. Not the online pricing but actual prices they are listing for at dealerships today.

That is true... The price estimate for the slate is not real and we won't know until 2026/2027 when it goes on sale, and as we've seen with every single new EV, they have that lovely price point in their PR events years ahead, but by the time the vehicle goes on sale...

Yes, the MSRP is higher and Ford is doing Ford pricing and you can buy for much less. With the Slate, it looks like it will be pure MSRP only there. Trucks always have deals running on them. EV direct sale cars sell for their list (or 10-20% higher than their PR event initial price by the time they sell)....

That's where I struggle to see it. I see a Santa Cruz at $24,300. A single Cab Silverado at $27,500. A Maverick hybrid at $24,000. A Frontier King Cab at $28,500. A Ram Quadcab Tradesman at $29k. I like EV's... I like cheap pickups. But I can't make that price point make sense to go with something as bare bones and non-practical as the slate outside of niche situations.
Shoot, where do you see a new 2025 Silverado for $27.5K? MSRP is $39,195 on Chevy's builder. The Ram has a starting price of $40,275.
 

cvollers

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chip
Joined
Apr 25, 2025
Threads
9
Messages
561
Reaction score
596
Location
Bellevue WA
Vehicles
FJ Cruiser
That's not "bad". Tesla has set the standard for "bad" electric pickup pricing expectation management with the Cybertruck. They pre-announced it in 2019 at a starting price of $39,990, then released it in 2023 at a starting price of $99,990. That's how to shock potential customers and torpedo sales. To be fair, as of 2025 Tesla offers a stripped single-motor CT for only $69,990, but this is still too high to bring back the masses of disappointed early reservation holders.

For Slate, the question is whether the pricing expectation should be "mid 20s" vs "high 20s". Given that the average transaction price for a new vehicle in the US is around $50,000, I doubt that this distinction matters greatly to most potential buyers. Clearly everyone is expecting "high 20s", but maybe Slate will pleasantly surprise us, and I don't think it will hurt them if they do.
The worst part is even at $40K for a Cybertruck, you still feel like you are getting ripped off.
 

skidoofast

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeremy
Joined
May 8, 2025
Threads
15
Messages
154
Reaction score
283
Location
Barnesville, MN
Vehicles
ford f 150, subaru outback
I’m reading this thread and wondering why slashsnake is on this forum, it seems to me he is a “it’s going to fail no matter what” kind of guy

obviously not a customer and it’s evident this vehicle wouldn’t fit his needs if they gave it away
 

Slashsnake

Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Jun 9, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
18
Reaction score
11
Location
Minnesota
Vehicles
Model 3. Maverick
Shoot, where do you see a new 2025 Silverado for $27.5K? MSRP is $39,195 on Chevy's builder. The Ram has a starting price of $40,275.
Because dealerships don't sell MSRP all the time, especially on trucks they run some big deals.

https://www.cargurus.com/Cars/new/searchresults.action?searchId=814ea291-a874-4b1f-b782-a9034091dda5&zip=56058&distance=50000&entitySelectingHelper.selectedEntity=d630&sourceContext=untrackedWithinSite_false_0&sortDir=ASC&sortType=PRICE&makeModelTrimPaths=m1/d630&makeModelTrimPaths=m1&srpVariation=NEW_CAR_SEARCH&isDeliveryEnabled=true&nonShippableBaseline=0#listing=407607237/NONE/DEFAULT

There's a Chevy even less.

https://www.cargurus.com/Cars/new/searchresults.action?nonShippableBaseline=0&searchId=1e9231d3-b70d-42ef-9b2c-500d3f55d693&zip=56058&distance=50000&sourceContext=untrackedWithinSite_false_0&newUsed=1&sortDir=ASC&sortType=PRICE&srpVariation=NEW_CAR_SEARCH&isDeliveryEnabled=true&entitySelectingHelper.selectedEntity=m191&makeModelTrimPaths=m191&makeModelTrimPaths=m191/d2110#listing=359157504/NONE/DEFAULT

And a Ram.

I'm curious. Do people actually just go pay MSRP and not shop today? I guess then yes, if you don't want to look for a deal, that does make a difference. Yeah I get MSRP if you want something exactly how you want it. Or if you are buying a new ZR1 or something along those lines. But for me, I always tended to shop around and see who's running the best deals first.
 
Last edited:

Slashsnake

Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Jun 9, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
18
Reaction score
11
Location
Minnesota
Vehicles
Model 3. Maverick
I’m reading this thread and wondering why slashsnake is on this forum, it seems to me he is a “it’s going to fail no matter what” kind of guy

obviously not a customer and it’s evident this vehicle wouldn’t fit his needs if they gave it away
Not really, and I get it's easier to go after the person than the facts and data and if you want to do that, you have every right... But I'm curious, but I can't see the price point for what you get.

Not saying it's going to fail, but no one is really explaining that side of it how at that price it's going to work. Like sure, we can dream their PR department is fudging the numbers high, or we can play that MSRP is the only price you pay for a vehicle. But I'm more looking at the reality than that kind of game to be honest. And I'm struggling to see where it fits. $27k... $30k... that's a lot to pay for what it looks like you are getting there.
 

Dorbiman

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 30, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
53
Reaction score
101
Location
WA
Vehicles
2005 Pontiac GTO
No need to be smarmy. The cheapest new Silverado within 75 miles of me is $38775. Yes I’m sure if I travel half way across the country I could fine one cheaper.

Then don’t forget to add on dealer fees, PDI fees, transportation fees, required addons to “qualify” for the list price, etc etc.
 

skidoofast

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeremy
Joined
May 8, 2025
Threads
15
Messages
154
Reaction score
283
Location
Barnesville, MN
Vehicles
ford f 150, subaru outback
Not really, I'm curious, but I can't see the price point for what you get. Not saying it's going to fail, but no one is really explaining that side of it how at that price it's going to work. Like sure, we can dream their PR department is fudging the numbers high, or we can play that MSRP is the only price you pay for a vehicle. But I'm more looking at the reality than that kind of game to be honest. And I'm struggling to see where it fits
im banking it will work because of how I and seemingly many feel

I have said for years now if a company made a stripped down vehicle or remade a say 1970 Chevy c10 with today’s engine and suspension but bare bones interior and interior technology it would be a huge sucess

similar to the slate idea

small pickup (think 1987 ford ranger)
Simplistic interior
Ability to “make it yours” and do it yourself
An intro to EV
——
Now also think fleet like parts runners, pizza delivery, ect
 

Slashsnake

Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Jun 9, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
18
Reaction score
11
Location
Minnesota
Vehicles
Model 3. Maverick
No need to be smarmy. The cheapest new Silverado within 75 miles of me is $38775. Yes I’m sure if I travel half way across the country I could fine one cheaper.

Then don’t forget to add on dealer fees, PDI fees, transportation fees, required addons to “qualify” for the list price, etc etc.
Agree, and don't forget that Slate noted that their price did not include fees either. I'm not being smarmy, I just thought people shopped and didn't just pay MSRP and knew that dealers run deals on pickups a LOT.
 
 
Top