Letas
Well-Known Member
Top-down vs bottom-up. Fair enough.![]()
JK.
My comment wasn't about that. It was about describing all sorts of car shoppers who wouldn't buy a Slate being neither necessary nor helpful.
Top-down vs bottom-up. Fair enough.![]()
JK.
My comment wasn't about that. It was about describing all sorts of car shoppers who wouldn't buy a Slate being neither necessary nor helpful.
Maybe you have not noticed Maverick does not come in a 100% EV configuration. I want a 100% EV for a commuter.No one has made a good argument that the Maverick is not a competitor with the Slate Truck.
If you don't like Ford, that's a good argument.No one has made a good argument that the Maverick is not a competitor with the Slate Truck.
Not to be confused with,”but a Maverick…”If you don't like Ford, that's a good argument.
If you don't like stealerships and prefer direct-to-consumer, that's a good argument.
If you prefer a smaller vehicle, that's a good argument.
If you prefer low-tech simplicity and no telematics, that's a good argument.
If you don't like crippled features that require subcription fees, that's a good argument.
If you prefer RWD rather than FWD, that's a good argument.
If you prefer two doors rather than four, that's a good argument.
If you want to own a unique vehicle from a scrappy startup, that's a good argument.
If you prefer the brilliant "timeless and familiar form", that's a good argument.
If you want lower maintenance burden (and cost), that's a good argument.
If you prefer lower cost-of-ownership, that's a good argument.
If you want to change your car's color every once in a while, that's a good argument.
If you want a car built in the United States rather than Mexico, that's a good argument.
If you want something highly customizable with DIY Accessories, that's a good argument.
...and those are just for starters.
But a Mavrick, according to Ford, does not have a subscription fee, only the Mach E, Explorer, and Super Duty trucks have Ford Connect as a subscription. And since the Slate has no connectivity whatsoever, even if a Maverick had the connectivity package one would not have to buy it and they would be evenly disconnected just as much with a Slate.If you don't like Ford, that's a good argument.
If you don't like stealerships and prefer direct-to-consumer, that's a good argument.
If you prefer a smaller vehicle, that's a good argument.
If you prefer low-tech simplicity and no telematics, that's a good argument.
If you don't like crippled features that require subcription fees, that's a good argument.
If you prefer RWD rather than FWD, that's a good argument.
If you prefer two doors rather than four, that's a good argument.
If you want to own a unique vehicle from a scrappy startup, that's a good argument.
If you prefer the brilliant "timeless and familiar form", that's a good argument.
If you want lower maintenance burden (and cost), that's a good argument.
If you prefer lower cost-of-ownership, that's a good argument.
If you want to change your car's color every once in a while, that's a good argument.
If you want a car built in the United States rather than Mexico, that's a good argument.
If you want something highly customizable with DIY Accessories, that's a good argument.
...and those are just for starters.
I'd like to push back on this point specifically. Even if doesn't have a subscription, I'd have a hard time believing the Maverick doesn't have a way to phone home data. But this isn't too much of an argument as we don't know 100% if the Slate will do this either until someone gets one and digs into it.But a Mavrick, according to Ford, does not have a subscription fee, only the Mach E, Explorer, and Super Duty trucks have Ford Connect as a subscription. And since the Slate has no connectivity whatsoever, even if a Maverick had the connectivity package one would not have to buy it and they would be evenly disconnected just as much with a Slate.
I thought it did because I read this:But a Mavrick, according to Ford, does not have a subscription fee