BeachHead
Member
- First Name
- Bob
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2025
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 31
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV
- Vehicles
- None
For me, even if the maverick was cheaper than the slate, I'm not interested in it at all. It simply doesn't offer the feature set that makes me interested in what slate is advertising: EV only, with a range that works for me, at a price point that minimizes my loss if I don't find the EV platform and it's current compromises worth dealing with. I don't need it to tow or haul anything over 1000lbs (got a real truck for that). I don't need it to travel cross country (I have other cars for that). The one feature I desire that the maverick has that the slate doesn't come standard with, a back seat, can be added with little fuss. (but who knows at what cost).
I have a reservation for a slate. But I'm not necessarily going to exercise it when it becomes available, as who knows what the actual "out the door" pricing will be, in the configuration I want, when my turn comes up. But, even if I were to pass on the slate, I'm not going to run down to the local ford dealer and move into a maverick. It just has no appeal to me. I'm sure there are some out there who find the maverick and slate cross compare to each other, and that is fine. But not everyone who's closely watching how the slate develops will.
I have a reservation for a slate. But I'm not necessarily going to exercise it when it becomes available, as who knows what the actual "out the door" pricing will be, in the configuration I want, when my turn comes up. But, even if I were to pass on the slate, I'm not going to run down to the local ford dealer and move into a maverick. It just has no appeal to me. I'm sure there are some out there who find the maverick and slate cross compare to each other, and that is fine. But not everyone who's closely watching how the slate develops will.