AZFox
Well-Known Member
In your opinion.The later OHC version of the 4.0 is at the bottom of the list for it
In your opinion.The later OHC version of the 4.0 is at the bottom of the list for it
* AI generated answer * kind of disqualifies the entire thing. The early 4.0s are super sought after, in 2001 they swapped over the the overhead cam ones and they went to shit. Same applies to the explorer.In your opinion.
![]()
AI surfs the web and finds out what people actually say there.* AI generated answer * kind of disqualifies the entire thing.
AI is notoriously inaccurate in almost all regards and has told people to do everything from shoving pennies into sockets to using glue to thicken pizza sauce. It is often horrendous at providing context or using reasonAI surfs the web and finds out what people actually say there.
Because what people say on the net is inaccurate.AI is notoriously inaccurate
And these observed opinions are still inaccurate lol, also the AI was unable to differentiate between the versions of the 4.0.Because what people say on the net is inaccurate.
In this instance it's based on observed opinions, with references.
Now let's leave this thread to discussion of the OT.
Only the SOHC version was offered.And these observed opinions are still inaccurate lol, also the AI was unable to differentiate between the versions of the 4.0.
Like any other tool, AI can be misused or used properly.Again, I get you're a tech guy and you love this type of stuff, but don't be an AI person. There are entire youtube series dedicated to making fun of people who listen to AI. Don't be part of that.
Pushrod until '01. Pushrod 4.0 and its base architecture existed for far longer than the SOHC didOnly the SOHC version was offered.
The discussion is about "A used Ford Ranger from the 2000s could operate for the next 10-15 years".Pushrod until '01. Pushrod 4.0 existed for far longer than the SOHC did
Discussion was about the 90s and 2000s trucks the Slate is designed to emulate.The discussion is about "A used Ford Ranger from the 2000s could operate for the next 10-15 years".
I'd argue that it's a small mix of both opinions, sort of an "en masse". I.E. the Slate at 20k vs at 30k. Buyers exist at both price points, a lot more at the former I'd assume.Fair enough. There's where our opinions diverge. I'm saying value is objectively the amount paid by the buyer, not what someone else thinks the buyer should have paid.
I quoted exactly what you wrote.Discussion was about the 90s and 2000s trucks the Slate is designed to emulate.
You're exactly right because the value at the time of the transaction is ephemeral. It's only a current market value for that exact item at that exact time.I'd argue that it's a small mix of both opinions, sort of an "en masse". I.E. the Slate at 20k vs at 30k. Buyers exist at both price points, a lot more at the former I'd assume.