Slate Mobile App (UX / UI - My Concept)

[ryan759]

Hi all,

What are peoples expectations for the mobile app?

I've mocked up some different designs based on the features and design language I would like to see on the tablet version.

Obviously some of these features would only be available with specific accessories, but it would be great to see software integration for things like side indicator based cameras.

 

[Monkfruit]

There will need to be some hardware interface to the tablet for more useful integration. I wonder if an OBD interconnect with the app could allow for a lot more useful stuff.

 

[beatle]

I'd also consider what things the cluster display will show. With some people opting to use a phone as their infotainment display, space will be at a premium. SoC and speed will almost surely not be on the app.

AA wirelessly integrates with the SoC on Ford (and other) vehicles. It's feasible to think Slate will also make connections to the truck for things like SoC via a wireless connection. The least expensive thing may be to do very little integration with the app as that creates failure points. They may expect people to use their phone like they do in a car from 15-20 years ago that has almost no connection to the car itself.

I think an AA/CP solution will be what they push people towards as that offloads much (almost all) of the development work. But I'm also kind of new here and I haven't kept up on what Slate's infotainment plans are other than an open space in the dash for you to BYOD. Maybe just charging controls/stats?

 

[Letas]

I'd also consider what things the cluster display will show. With some people opting to use a phone as their infotainment display, space will be at a premium. SoC and speed will almost surely not be on the app.

AA wirelessly integrates with the SoC on Ford (and other) vehicles. It's feasible to think Slate will also make connections to the truck for things like SoC via a wireless connection. The least expensive thing may be to do very little integration with the app as that creates failure points. They may expect people to use their phone like they do in a car from 15-20 years ago that has almost no connection to the car itself.

I think an AA/CP solution will be what they push people towards as that offloads much (almost all) of the development work. But I'm also kind of new here and I haven't kept up on what Slate's infotainment plans are other than an open space in the dash for you to BYOD. Maybe just charging controls/stats?

Integrated Android auto/carplay solutions are far and away a better solution, but Slate has shown no desire to offer reasonable support for that, so we shall see...

BYOD (tablet or phone in a mount) brings heaps of problems that don't need to exist, we've already figured out how to do this.

 

[beatle]

Wow, I had no idea. With software becoming one of the things that trips up so many manufacturers, it's kind of crazy for a new automaker to try to build an app to interface with their vehicle. Seems like the hardware investment saved in the vehicle would be overwhelmed by the cost and complexity of trying to support so many external devices for critical functions.

 

[Letas]

Wow, I had no idea. With software becoming one of the things that trips up so many manufacturers, it's kind of crazy for a new automaker to try to build an app to interface with their vehicle. Seems like the hardware investment saved in the vehicle would be overwhelmed by the cost and complexity of trying to support so many external devices for critical functions.

Agree. There are so many third parties that make great double din Carplay displays. I don't understand why Slate wouldn't at least offered a "preferred vendor" with option for install from the factory. Look at the backlash around Tesla, Rivian, etc. for not including Carplay. It is so obviously something customers care about, and Slate is telling us to "figure it out ourselves". Low labor investment, high customer satisfaction. If their app is anything shy of a gimmick I will be amazed.

 

[beatle]

Exactly. I was just thinking of it being cheap to implement an AA/CP solution since that is one of Slate's top goals. But hey, toss in some free customer satisfaction and you've got a deal.

Similarly, I stopped rolling my own once I tried the smooth taste and rich tobacco flavor of a Laramie cigarette.

 

[ScooterAsheville]

Some of the threads on this forum make my mind wander back to the book "Great Expectations". I suggest "Low Expectations". Right now, I setiously think Slate just wants to ship something that can move under its own power without catching fire (or doing the Cybertruck thing and having bits and pieces falling off). With only $700 million in capital raised (not counting the mysterious Series C), moving without burning down is a solid achievement.

 

[Letas]

Some of the threads on this forum make my mind wander back to the book "Great Expectations". I suggest "Low Expectations". Right now, I setiously think Slate just wants to ship something that can move under its own power without catching fire (or doing the Cybertruck thing and having bits and pieces falling off). With only $700 million in capital raised (not counting the mysterious Series C), moving without burning down is a solid achievement.

Minimizing external funding does not benefit the consumer, only the PE firms invested in the company. I want a good product output. That benefits the consumer.
This is such a softball for the company it’s almost hilarious if they miss on it. Myself and I’m sure many many customers would be happy to pay a premium to have an integrated head unit (and speakers) on delivery day. Obviously an option. Not stock.