What limits the Slate to 1000 pounds towing capacity?

[AZFox]

That is a step bumper. Trailer ball bolts through hole in the horizontal surface below the license plate. Every truck I have owned has had a very similar bumper with holes in it to mount the trailer ball. It is only rated at 1000 pounds, the step bumper is good for it.

I've towed with a hitch ball mounted on a bumper since several decades ago, so I know how that works.

That's why I can look at the bumpers we've seen so far and tell they weren't designed to accept a hitch ball and safety chains.

Slate's design philosophy is to leave out what isn't necessary.
It's not necessary for the stock bumper to have towing capability.
Slate will offer a Hitch Receiver accessory for towing.

 

[KevinRS]

Slate's design philosophy is to leave out what isn't necessary.
It's not necessary for the stock bumper to have towing capability.
Slate will offer a Hitch Receiver accessory for towing.

Part of what is confusing on it is the standard bumper looks like a step bumper, which would have holes or knockouts for a hitch ball and for chains to hook, which would probably be the cheapest possible option, and fits with the stated tow rating.
Then the upgraded bumper is definitely not a step bumper, more of a box bumper, with the license plate right where a hitch might go, and a shallow sloped plastic underside with no frame or other metal visible where an accessory would mount.
It's got to be something that just wasn't designed yet when they built the prototypes we've seen, probably 5 or more months ago.

 

[AZFox]

Part of what is confusing on it is the standard bumper looks like a step bumper, which would have holes or knockouts for a hitch ball and for chains to hook, which would probably be the cheapest possible option, and fits with the stated tow rating.

It would be cost less to make it not capable and require the Hitch Receiver option if you want to tow.

I'm assuming a more capable bumper costs more to make, which is a pretty safe assumption.

 

[KevinRS]

It all depends on the decisions they made, and we probably won't know any more until they make another round of announcements, maybe in October when they start the tour back up.

 

[AZFox]

Now we know slightly more. That looks like it hangs pretty low and it requires an extension.

 

[Trace26]

Now we know slightly more. That looks like it hangs pretty low and it requires an extension.

That's a beefy setup for only 1000lbs

 

[Daemoch]

I suspect the extension is just because that particular hitch wasnt long enough. hitches themselves do come in various arm lengths technically. Were all just used to seeing the short arm ones for big trucks with very exposed receivers.

Ive got an extension I can use if I need to but it cuts the total load ability in half. If I plan ahead I just use a longer armed hitch and then I have full load capability.

 

[KevinRS]

This may also just be a temporary setup they did for the test, and the mounting point of production trucks isn't seen here.

 

[E90400K]

So... today I was looking up the price to rent a motorcycle trailer from U-Haul. I noticed that even their smallest box trailer and utility trailers are over 1,000 pounds minimum tow rating. This might be problematic for Slate.

 

[KevinRS]

So... today I was looking up the price to rent a motorcycle trailer from U-Haul. I noticed that even their smallest box trailer and utility trailers are over 1,000 pounds minimum tow rating. This might be problematic for Slate.

I don't know how they are calculating this. Empty that 2nd trailer is 630 lbs, I'm not finding the page you screenshot to see what the hazard icons are for.
630 lbs still doesn't leave a lot of room for load, you've only got 330 lbs left from how I calculate it.

 

[Johnologue]

Does it matter that the Slate Truck has a "50/50" weight distribution, as was mentioned on the recent Q&A summary?

I don't know about trucks/towing, but I realized that might be a limiting factor in how much weight can be added to the rear of the vehicle, and something that wouldn't come up on most front-heavy ICEVs, or the other overall-heavy EV trucks (it seems everything else is at least around 6000 lbs).

50% of 3600 would be 1800 lbs on each axle, so putting ~1000 lbs toward the rear might be relatively challenging. Or would that not matter?

 

[KevinRS]

Does it matter that the Slate Truck has a "50/50" weight distribution, as was mentioned on the recent Q&A summary?

I don't know about trucks/towing, but I realized that might be a limiting factor in how much weight can be added to the rear of the vehicle, and something that wouldn't come up on most front-heavy ICEVs, or the other overall-heavy EV trucks (it seems everything else is at least around 6000 lbs).

50% of 3600 would be 1800 lbs on each axle, so putting ~1000 lbs toward the rear might be relatively challenging. Or would that not matter?

Pretty sure that is part of why it is only 1400 lbs payload and 1000 towing. Since it's kind of hard to load with more than that in total between driver, passenger, frunk load and bed load without putting too much on the rear axles and not enough on the front - steering axles, they set that as the target and engineered for it. At that, the wheels are about as far to the front and rear as they reasonably can, unlike many which put the rear axle mid-bed or even further forward, which works with a heavy engine at the front, 4 people, and a load, but means a full load mostly in the bed is still unbalanced.