cadblu
Well-Known Member
Any idea what Subà would have charged for this repair? I’m sitting down.Amen to that. My Subaru was great, but the blend motor buried in the dash would slowly fail over time.
Any idea what Subà would have charged for this repair? I’m sitting down.Amen to that. My Subaru was great, but the blend motor buried in the dash would slowly fail over time.
The part was reasonable at $80 including shipping. Labor charge was 2 hours, so we're looking around $500 which you see quoted online.Any idea what Subà would have charged for this repair? I’m sitting down.
I thought the choices were cables or electronic. Not sure what you mean by digital?Electronic doesn't necessarily mean digital. Simple rheostats for the fan and temp and a multi-pole switch for the mode would be a typical low-cost/low-complexity solution.
Check the repair pal site. That is how they got their start. My bet is $1500.Any idea what Subà would have charged for this repair? I’m sitting down.
No. That sounds like automatic climate control. It's not quite that digital. There was another discussion about climate control and disagreement about what climate control really is. I don't see any temperature digits on the dials. Therefore I don't consider it climate control. It looks like you need to push the knobs in to engage the function and the light on the knob will light when engaged. I know the digits and my hands can do that. Not sure if electrics will do that.I thought the choices were cables or electronic. Not sure what you mean by digital?
That’s how I see it.I think it is a reality that there will not be remote control of the HVAC, whether by fob or app/telematics; merely on or off - and the hvac will merely run as per its dials, meaning 'last setting'.
Rheostats were at one time used for instrument panel lights but heater fan speed was controlled by multiple taps on the motor windings and a multi-position rotary switch. That is because it's tough to dissipate 100 or more Watts on a rheostat to vary the fan speed.Electronic doesn't necessarily mean digital. Simple rheostats for the fan and temp and a multi-pole switch for the mode would be a typical low-cost/low-complexity solution.
>- This kind of falls into the "be careful what you wish for" category. We wanted simple, we got simple; now we gotta live with it. -<I think it is a reality that there will not be remote control of the HVAC, whether by fob or app/telematics; merely on or off - and the hvac will merely run as per its dials, meaning 'last setting'.
while it is *possible* to have software override the type of system we presume Slate to have (based on dial appearance), it simply would make no sense. If remote hvac control were a priority to Slate engineers, they simply would have designed it in the first place with a rudimentary, digital climate control system. That literally would have been simpler then automating the apparant physical controls that they wanted to promote (ie, the "simplicity").
This kind of falls into the "be careful what you wish for" category. We wanted simple, we got simple; now we gotta live with it.
I'm not too tweaked, it is what it is. I'll adapt.
I'm not necessarily disagreeing. I have two functional 25 yo cars in my driveway.>- This kind of falls into the "be careful what you wish for" category. We wanted simple, we got simple; now we gotta live with it. -<
That's right. I want heater controls that still work when my Slate is 25 years old, and fully manual controls make that more likely.