His intentions were right. The person who he asked is wrong. I don't see the issue.The OP asked a security guard, whose response was perfect, "We'll call the police on you." LOL.
It's the private company's private business as to their execution of moving their product from prototype to full rate production, why do we need to know? Curiosity is not a proper intention. It's just being nosey. A bit creepy in my opinion. Just let the company alone.His intentions were right. The person who he asked is wrong. I don't see the issue.
Or they could release progress reports (like another EV company that starts with “S”) that always say the same thing.It's the private company's private business as to their execution of moving their product from prototype to full rate production, why do we need to know? Curiosity is not a proper intention. It's just being nosey. A bit creepy in my opinion. Just let the company alone.
If they want to release progress reports, great. We don't need to spy on them. Lol.
"We poured more of the concrete floor."Or they could release progress reports (like another EV company that starts with “S”) that always say the same thing.
That's a fair opinion to have, but I disagree that taking drone videos of a company's property when given explicit permission to do so is a bad thing. There's nothing wrong with excitement and curiosity over Slate. If anything, they can leverage that enthusiasm from prospective customers to really flesh out their relationship with their user base.It's the private company's private business as to their execution of moving their product from prototype to full rate production, why do we need to know? Curiosity is not a proper intention. It's just being nosey. A bit creepy in my opinion. Just let the company alone.
If they want to release progress reports, great. We don't need to spy on them. Lol.
Has this law ever been enforced and held up in court? I can bring up Google Earth or Maps, and get pretty detailed photography of most anywhere. Has everyone in Indiana agreed to this, or is the Alphabet C-suite in jail?Indiana Code Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure § 35-46-8.5-1 relates to "Unlawful Photography and Surveillance on Private Property." This statute generally makes it a Class A misdemeanor to knowingly and intentionally conduct electronic surveillance of another person's private property without their permission.
For drones specifically:
Indiana Code IC 35-31.5-2-123.5 includes specific provisions regarding unauthorized drone use and privacy. It states that pilots cannot use drones to photograph or record individuals on private property without permission. Violating this law can lead to criminal charges or fines.