LFP Battery Cells - Is This Going To Be An Option (or future direction)?

MIDgrid

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
14
Reaction score
22
Location
Olympic Penninsula, WA
Vehicles
Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk, Sprinter 3500 motorhome
Changing to another battery chemistry doesn't necessarily mean Slate needs to change suppliers.

electrive: SK On to manufacture LFP battery cells
Given a choice, I would prefer LFP for additional safety and lifetime (charger cycles) over the NCM chemistry that Slate has announced. And maybe SK On will be able to minimize the energy density reduction/vehicle range reduction penalty:

“We are developing high-performance LFP batteries with high energy density and fast charging speed, based on our technological capabilities that have led the market for high energy density NCM batteries,” Yoon Hyung-jo, SK On’s head of planning, told an investor conference.

Slate has already indicated it is taking another look at battery suppliers since the slowdown in EV sales has made additional EV battery production capacity available. And SK On is planning to start production of LFP battery cells at their Georgia plant in the second half of 2026.
 

GaRailroader

Well-Known Member
First Name
PJ
Joined
Apr 26, 2025
Threads
8
Messages
237
Reaction score
394
Location
Atlanta, GA
Vehicles
2018 Tesla Model 3, 2022 Nissan Leaf
Heck, perhaps instead of having 2 choices of standard battery or extended range, they could use LFPs and come in with about a 200 mile range as the only choice in the extended range battery pack.
 
OP
OP

MIDgrid

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
14
Reaction score
22
Location
Olympic Penninsula, WA
Vehicles
Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk, Sprinter 3500 motorhome
Heck, perhaps instead of having 2 choices of standard battery or extended range, they could use LFPs and come in with about a 200 mile range as the only choice in the extended range battery pack.
Great idea - and by the way, it's my understanding that the battery case is the same size regardless of standard or extended range; the standard option cell count doesn't completely fill the case but the additional cells for the extended range do.
 

KevinRS

Well-Known Member
First Name
Kevin
Joined
Jul 4, 2025
Threads
2
Messages
459
Reaction score
603
Location
California
Vehicles
Nissan Versa
I think that announcing that extended range was going down from 240 to 200 might not be a popular decision. NMC is probably locked in for initial production, but they might later switch the standard range to something like a 200 mile LFP, as LFP is generally cheaper.
 

AZFox

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2025
Threads
33
Messages
1,140
Reaction score
1,536
Location
Arizona
Vehicles
Honda NC700X
I think that announcing that extended range was going down from 240 to 200 might not be a popular decision. NMC is probably locked in for initial production, but they might later switch the standard range to something like a 200 mile LFP, as LFP is generally cheaper.
What makes you think they'd use heavier batteries and increase capacity?

Bear in mind that load capacity decreases when battery weight increases.

Given that the LFP batteries have more usable range (as a practical matter), I think offering the same 150-mile capacity could be enough improvement.

Edit:
By "more usable range" I'm suggesting that charging to 100% every night instead of 80% would improve day-to-day usable range.
 
Last edited:

Dorbiman

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 30, 2025
Threads
3
Messages
444
Reaction score
710
Location
WA
Vehicles
2005 GTO, 2005 Silverado
What makes you think they'd use heavier batteries and increase capacity?
LFP is generally cheaper to produce than NMC, so it may be possible to maintain cost and increase range. We already know that the 150 mile NMC pack does not use all the space available, so a less energy dense solution may fit just fine. Not saying it's likely, but I definitely think it's possible
 
 
Top