The only truth I saw in the video was the presenter/CEO seems to be no stranger to eating doughnuts. Just sayin' (and I'm one to talk - LOL).Their claims are not true - if it was cheaper, lighter and real, I'd be buying them by the GWh today. Usually they mean "could be" cheaper (if global manufacturing is scaled by 10,000%, no problems are found, and all raw material pricing stays at the 2018 level which is the last time they did the calculation), "could be" lighter (if the energy density scales linearly, the fire testing goes perfectly, etc.). The proof of the pudding is in the eating - if it did all those things I'd place a PO tomorrow (but guess what...).
I work in this industry, and one of our sayings is "there are liars, damned liars, and battery suppliers". You can't trust a single thing they say until you have units in hand.
That isn't to say that solid state batteries don't have a future, or that there are applications for NaIon or other options, but they have a massive scale-up to do, and are competing with extremely well established and refined NMC, NCA and LFP products.
Hey Marko: You caught my attention with Donut Lab. Then I found out it was about solid-state batteries. Tell me about the donuts....The only truth I saw in the video was the presenter/CEO seems to be no stranger to eating doughnuts. Just sayin' (and I'm one to talk - LOL).
+1I know nothing about the battery industry, but from my limited/outsider perspective, battery tech today seems to be just like the RAM and HD advances in the 80s and 90s.
It will, and is, but the extremely high volume of production needed means that it is less like inventing new personal electronics type technology, and more a matter of manufacturing scale up technology, supply chain, and logistics. There are lots of great battery technologies that work in the lab, but can't be cost effectively scaled up.+1
IMHO the monumental demand for better battery technology will (eventually) lead to monumental breakthroughs.
Yeah, but it's a joke. $30,000. Lol.You can place a reservation ($100) for the bike on the Verge website with an estimated delivery of Q1 2026. Since that is within the next few months, they better have a product to deliver shortly. I can't imagine that these are imaginary at this point.
What you just said is what I have heard from many inside the industry. I have a friend who spent a lifetime career in batteries. He gives me this lecture every time I show him some exciting news release. His favorite saying is, "Tell me what ten characteristics you want in a battery, and I'll give you nine of them".It will, and is, but the extremely high volume of production needed means that it is less like inventing new personal electronics type technology, and more a matter of manufacturing scale up technology, supply chain, and logistics. There are lots of great battery technologies that work in the lab, but can't be cost effectively scaled up.
Safety and reliability are also incredibly hard to get right. Again, lots of options that work in the lab, but making them reliable (and PROVING that they are reliable) is a huge undertaking, and most companies never get it right. Modern NMC, NCA and LFP batteries are not perfect, but considering the volumes they are made in, they are extremely reliable, long lasting, and energy dense.
Other technologies will beat it, but it will take longer than most people think, and generally improvements in one area will mean a tradeoff somewhere else. For instance, sodium ion batteries work in a wider temperature range, but are less energy dense. Or metal hydrogen batteries are extremely cheap, but offer very low C-rates.
The company I work for buys many GWhs of NMC and LFP batteries per year, and we have supply agreements with many major manufacturers. When someone has something better, I'll buy it, but the burden of proof is very high, and so far, no one has been able to create a solution that has better levelized cost of storage for our applications.