dark star
Active Member
- Thread starter
- #31
Hey folks — I appreciate the spirited discussion here after I posted my desire for the BSW tech. I agree with the “set your mirrors correctly and pay attention” crowd… but I also think blind-spot warning is a genuinely useful backup, not a substitute for good driving.
I’m retired, and over decades behind the wheel I’ve logged well over 1,000,000 miles. I’ve been in several accidents (one put me in the hospital). None were my fault, and most were caused by the other driver being distracted — usually by a phone. The best safety feature in any car is still: put the damn phone down and drive.
That said, I’m pushing for BSW because I’ve personally had it “save” me a couple of times. Even with properly adjusted mirrors and a quick shoulder check, I still didn’t see a car that was there — and the warning stopped a lane change I was about to make. Humans miss things. Tech can sometimes catch the miss.
Also, for anyone who likes data: IIHS/HLDI research found vehicles with blind-spot monitoring had about 14% fewer lane-change crashes (and 23% fewer injury lane-change crashes) compared to the same models without the system. Humans make mistakes, “blind spots” can exist… whether due to reality, or misuse of the mirrors, or human errors, etc.
So my “wrap-up” point is simple: it would be great if Slate offered BSW as an optional feature. People who don’t want it shouldn’t have to pay for it — and people who do want, and believe in, that extra layer of protection should be able to add it. (NHTSA is even adding blind spot warning/intervention into its NCAP roadmap starting with the 2027 model year, which tells you it’s not a silly gimmick.)
(The statistics I mentioned is the best I could find from my research… statistics can always be twisted, so do not come at me if you find different numbers in your research).
Let’s hope we can all get this Slate vehicle as we want it, and l hope it’s original main appeal for me, PRICE and safety stays true.
I’m retired, and over decades behind the wheel I’ve logged well over 1,000,000 miles. I’ve been in several accidents (one put me in the hospital). None were my fault, and most were caused by the other driver being distracted — usually by a phone. The best safety feature in any car is still: put the damn phone down and drive.
That said, I’m pushing for BSW because I’ve personally had it “save” me a couple of times. Even with properly adjusted mirrors and a quick shoulder check, I still didn’t see a car that was there — and the warning stopped a lane change I was about to make. Humans miss things. Tech can sometimes catch the miss.
Also, for anyone who likes data: IIHS/HLDI research found vehicles with blind-spot monitoring had about 14% fewer lane-change crashes (and 23% fewer injury lane-change crashes) compared to the same models without the system. Humans make mistakes, “blind spots” can exist… whether due to reality, or misuse of the mirrors, or human errors, etc.
So my “wrap-up” point is simple: it would be great if Slate offered BSW as an optional feature. People who don’t want it shouldn’t have to pay for it — and people who do want, and believe in, that extra layer of protection should be able to add it. (NHTSA is even adding blind spot warning/intervention into its NCAP roadmap starting with the 2027 model year, which tells you it’s not a silly gimmick.)
(The statistics I mentioned is the best I could find from my research… statistics can always be twisted, so do not come at me if you find different numbers in your research).
Let’s hope we can all get this Slate vehicle as we want it, and l hope it’s original main appeal for me, PRICE and safety stays true.